Abstract
Purpose
In order to better understand how heuristics are used in practice, the authors explore what type of heuristics is used in the managerial domain of financial advisors to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and what influences the shaping of these heuristics. In doing so, the authors detect possible fast-and-frugal heuristics in day-to-day decision-making of independent financial advisers who help owners of SMEs to acquire capital (e.g. loans, factoring, leasing and equity).
Design/methodology/approach
The authors inductively assessed the work of financial advisers of SMEs. Based on group discussions, the authors drew up a semi-structured interview-protocol with descriptive questions about how financial advisers come to a deal for their clients. The interviews of 19 professionals were analysed by relating them to the theory of fast-and-frugal heuristics.
Findings
Within their decision-making, advisers estimate the likelihood of acceptance by a few financial providers they know well in their personal network with a strong bias towards traditional banking products, although there are a large number of alternatives on the Dutch market. “Less is more” seems to be a relevant principle when defined as satisficing. Heuristics help advisers to deal with behavioural and economic limitations. Also, the authors have found that client interaction, previous working experience and the company the adviser is working for influences the shaping of the simple rules the adviser is using.
Research limitations/implications
The study shows how difficult it is to understand the ecological rationality of a certain group of professionals and to understand the “less is more” principle. Financial advisers to SMEs use cognitive shortcuts and simple rules to advise SME-owners, based on previous experiences, but it is difficult to determine whether that leads to the same or even better solutions for them and their clients than using probability theory and financial optimisation models. Within heuristics, satisficing seems to be a dominant mechanism. Here, heuristics help advisers in recognising possibilities by searching for similarities between a current financing case and previous experiences. The data suggests that if “less is more” is defined as satisficing for one or more stakeholders involved, the principle dominates the decision making of financial advisers of SME's.
Practical implications
The authors suggest the relevance of a behavioural approach to finance by assessing the day-to-day decisions of financial advisers of SMEs. Also, the authors suggest that financial advisers are guided by previous experiences, and they do not fully assess a wide range of options in their work but need shortcuts to fulfil the needs of their clients.
Originality/value
The study comes close to day-to-day decision-making in finance by assessing how professionals make decisions. The authors try to understand types of heuristics in relation with “ecological rationality” and the less is more principle. The authors assess financial advisers of SME-companies, a group that has gotten little research attention until now. The influence of client interaction and of the company the adviser is working for is remarkable in the shaping of the advisers' simple rules.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1728-1749 |
| Journal | Management Decision |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Aug 2021 |
Access to Document
Handle.net
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Rauwerda, K. (2021). Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market. Management Decision, 59(7), 1728-1749. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1269
Rauwerda, Kirsten ; De Graaf, Frank Jan . / Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market. In: Management Decision. 2021 ; Vol. 59, No. 7. pp. 1728-1749.
@article{eed402e7589242eca60d16bf5bace51a,
title = "Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market",
abstract = "PurposeIn order to better understand how heuristics are used in practice, the authors explore what type of heuristics is used in the managerial domain of financial advisors to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and what influences the shaping of these heuristics. In doing so, the authors detect possible fast-and-frugal heuristics in day-to-day decision-making of independent financial advisers who help owners of SMEs to acquire capital (e.g. loans, factoring, leasing and equity).Design/methodology/approachThe authors inductively assessed the work of financial advisers of SMEs. Based on group discussions, the authors drew up a semi-structured interview-protocol with descriptive questions about how financial advisers come to a deal for their clients. The interviews of 19 professionals were analysed by relating them to the theory of fast-and-frugal heuristics.FindingsWithin their decision-making, advisers estimate the likelihood of acceptance by a few financial providers they know well in their personal network with a strong bias towards traditional banking products, although there are a large number of alternatives on the Dutch market. “Less is more” seems to be a relevant principle when defined as satisficing. Heuristics help advisers to deal with behavioural and economic limitations. Also, the authors have found that client interaction, previous working experience and the company the adviser is working for influences the shaping of the simple rules the adviser is using.Research limitations/implicationsThe study shows how difficult it is to understand the ecological rationality of a certain group of professionals and to understand the “less is more” principle. Financial advisers to SMEs use cognitive shortcuts and simple rules to advise SME-owners, based on previous experiences, but it is difficult to determine whether that leads to the same or even better solutions for them and their clients than using probability theory and financial optimisation models. Within heuristics, satisficing seems to be a dominant mechanism. Here, heuristics help advisers in recognising possibilities by searching for similarities between a current financing case and previous experiences. The data suggests that if “less is more” is defined as satisficing for one or more stakeholders involved, the principle dominates the decision making of financial advisers of SME's.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest the relevance of a behavioural approach to finance by assessing the day-to-day decisions of financial advisers of SMEs. Also, the authors suggest that financial advisers are guided by previous experiences, and they do not fully assess a wide range of options in their work but need shortcuts to fulfil the needs of their clients.Originality/valueThe study comes close to day-to-day decision-making in finance by assessing how professionals make decisions. The authors try to understand types of heuristics in relation with “ecological rationality” and the less is more principle. The authors assess financial advisers of SME-companies, a group that has gotten little research attention until now. The influence of client interaction and of the company the adviser is working for is remarkable in the shaping of the advisers' simple rules.",
keywords = "Decision-making, Heuristics, SME-finance, Satisficing",
author = "Kirsten Rauwerda and {De Graaf}, {Frank Jan}",
note = "With supplementary file. Funding Information: The authors would like to acknowledge the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and his colleagues Jamal Abid and Lex van Teeffelen for their work within this research project. The research is (partly) funded by the Dutch Research Council/SIA Raak, project “Naar MKB-advies over gestapeld financieren”. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1108/MD-09-2019-1269",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1728--1749",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",
number = "7",
}
Rauwerda, K 2021, 'Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market', Management Decision, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1728-1749. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2019-1269
Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market. / Rauwerda, Kirsten; De Graaf, Frank Jan .
In: Management Decision, Vol. 59, No. 7, 17.08.2021, p. 1728-1749.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market
AU - Rauwerda, Kirsten
AU - De Graaf, Frank Jan
N1 - With supplementary file. Funding Information:The authors would like to acknowledge the editors and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and his colleagues Jamal Abid and Lex van Teeffelen for their work within this research project. The research is (partly) funded by the Dutch Research Council/SIA Raak, project “Naar MKB-advies over gestapeld financieren”.Publisher Copyright:© 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2021/8/17
Y1 - 2021/8/17
N2 - PurposeIn order to better understand how heuristics are used in practice, the authors explore what type of heuristics is used in the managerial domain of financial advisors to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and what influences the shaping of these heuristics. In doing so, the authors detect possible fast-and-frugal heuristics in day-to-day decision-making of independent financial advisers who help owners of SMEs to acquire capital (e.g. loans, factoring, leasing and equity).Design/methodology/approachThe authors inductively assessed the work of financial advisers of SMEs. Based on group discussions, the authors drew up a semi-structured interview-protocol with descriptive questions about how financial advisers come to a deal for their clients. The interviews of 19 professionals were analysed by relating them to the theory of fast-and-frugal heuristics.FindingsWithin their decision-making, advisers estimate the likelihood of acceptance by a few financial providers they know well in their personal network with a strong bias towards traditional banking products, although there are a large number of alternatives on the Dutch market. “Less is more” seems to be a relevant principle when defined as satisficing. Heuristics help advisers to deal with behavioural and economic limitations. Also, the authors have found that client interaction, previous working experience and the company the adviser is working for influences the shaping of the simple rules the adviser is using.Research limitations/implicationsThe study shows how difficult it is to understand the ecological rationality of a certain group of professionals and to understand the “less is more” principle. Financial advisers to SMEs use cognitive shortcuts and simple rules to advise SME-owners, based on previous experiences, but it is difficult to determine whether that leads to the same or even better solutions for them and their clients than using probability theory and financial optimisation models. Within heuristics, satisficing seems to be a dominant mechanism. Here, heuristics help advisers in recognising possibilities by searching for similarities between a current financing case and previous experiences. The data suggests that if “less is more” is defined as satisficing for one or more stakeholders involved, the principle dominates the decision making of financial advisers of SME's.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest the relevance of a behavioural approach to finance by assessing the day-to-day decisions of financial advisers of SMEs. Also, the authors suggest that financial advisers are guided by previous experiences, and they do not fully assess a wide range of options in their work but need shortcuts to fulfil the needs of their clients.Originality/valueThe study comes close to day-to-day decision-making in finance by assessing how professionals make decisions. The authors try to understand types of heuristics in relation with “ecological rationality” and the less is more principle. The authors assess financial advisers of SME-companies, a group that has gotten little research attention until now. The influence of client interaction and of the company the adviser is working for is remarkable in the shaping of the advisers' simple rules.
AB - PurposeIn order to better understand how heuristics are used in practice, the authors explore what type of heuristics is used in the managerial domain of financial advisors to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and what influences the shaping of these heuristics. In doing so, the authors detect possible fast-and-frugal heuristics in day-to-day decision-making of independent financial advisers who help owners of SMEs to acquire capital (e.g. loans, factoring, leasing and equity).Design/methodology/approachThe authors inductively assessed the work of financial advisers of SMEs. Based on group discussions, the authors drew up a semi-structured interview-protocol with descriptive questions about how financial advisers come to a deal for their clients. The interviews of 19 professionals were analysed by relating them to the theory of fast-and-frugal heuristics.FindingsWithin their decision-making, advisers estimate the likelihood of acceptance by a few financial providers they know well in their personal network with a strong bias towards traditional banking products, although there are a large number of alternatives on the Dutch market. “Less is more” seems to be a relevant principle when defined as satisficing. Heuristics help advisers to deal with behavioural and economic limitations. Also, the authors have found that client interaction, previous working experience and the company the adviser is working for influences the shaping of the simple rules the adviser is using.Research limitations/implicationsThe study shows how difficult it is to understand the ecological rationality of a certain group of professionals and to understand the “less is more” principle. Financial advisers to SMEs use cognitive shortcuts and simple rules to advise SME-owners, based on previous experiences, but it is difficult to determine whether that leads to the same or even better solutions for them and their clients than using probability theory and financial optimisation models. Within heuristics, satisficing seems to be a dominant mechanism. Here, heuristics help advisers in recognising possibilities by searching for similarities between a current financing case and previous experiences. The data suggests that if “less is more” is defined as satisficing for one or more stakeholders involved, the principle dominates the decision making of financial advisers of SME's.Practical implicationsThe authors suggest the relevance of a behavioural approach to finance by assessing the day-to-day decisions of financial advisers of SMEs. Also, the authors suggest that financial advisers are guided by previous experiences, and they do not fully assess a wide range of options in their work but need shortcuts to fulfil the needs of their clients.Originality/valueThe study comes close to day-to-day decision-making in finance by assessing how professionals make decisions. The authors try to understand types of heuristics in relation with “ecological rationality” and the less is more principle. The authors assess financial advisers of SME-companies, a group that has gotten little research attention until now. The influence of client interaction and of the company the adviser is working for is remarkable in the shaping of the advisers' simple rules.
KW - Decision-making
KW - Heuristics
KW - SME-finance
KW - Satisficing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108104690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1269
DO - 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1269
M3 - Article
SN - 0025-1747
VL - 59
SP - 1728
EP - 1749
JO - Management Decision
JF - Management Decision
IS - 7
ER -
Rauwerda K, De Graaf FJ. Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market. Management Decision. 2021 Aug 17;59(7):1728-1749. doi: 10.1108/MD-09-2019-1269
I'm an expert in the field of financial decision-making and heuristics, with a deep understanding of the complexities involved in the managerial domain of financial advisors, particularly those assisting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). My expertise is grounded in practical knowledge, and I've delved into the intricacies of how heuristics are applied in day-to-day decision-making processes.
Now, let's break down the key concepts and findings from the article you provided:
Title: Heuristics in financial decision-making: the selection of SME financing by advisers in an increasingly diverse market
Authors: Kirsten Rauwerda and Frank Jan De Graaf
Abstract: The purpose of the study is to understand how heuristics are used in the managerial domain of financial advisors to SMEs and what influences the shaping of these heuristics. The authors explore fast-and-frugal heuristics in the decision-making of independent financial advisors helping SME owners acquire capital.
Methodology: The authors inductively assessed the work of financial advisors through group discussions. A semi-structured interview protocol with descriptive questions was developed based on these discussions. The interviews of 19 professionals were then analyzed in relation to the theory of fast-and-frugal heuristics.
Findings:
- Advisors estimate the likelihood of acceptance by a few known financial providers in their personal network, showing a bias towards traditional banking products.
- "Less is more" is relevant, defined as satisficing, where heuristics help advisors deal with behavioral and economic limitations.
- Client interaction, previous working experience, and the company the advisor works for influence the shaping of the simple rules they use.
Research Limitations/Implications:
- The study highlights the difficulty in understanding the ecological rationality of financial advisors.
- Financial advisors use cognitive shortcuts and simple rules based on previous experiences, making it challenging to assess whether this leads to better solutions than using probability theory and financial optimization models.
- Satisficing appears to be a dominant mechanism within heuristics.
Practical Implications:
- The authors suggest the relevance of a behavioral approach to finance by assessing the day-to-day decisions of financial advisors of SMEs.
- Financial advisors rely on previous experiences and may not fully assess a wide range of options, using shortcuts to fulfill the needs of their clients.
Originality/Value:
- The study closely examines day-to-day decision-making in finance, aiming to understand types of heuristics in relation to "ecological rationality" and the "less is more" principle.
- It assesses financial advisors of SMEs, a group that has received little research attention until now.
This research sheds light on the practical aspects of financial decision-making, showcasing the use of heuristics and the impact of various factors on the decision-making process of advisors to SMEs.
